Terman’s law: “Education is what you get from reading the small print. Experience is what you get from not reading it”
PART
1 – The Theory
Please
don’t be frightened off this initial part as possibly being too technical - it
is not as mathematical as you think. It
is important to understand the shape and feel of the figures
illustrated in the various tables. It
is not necessary to test every line, unless you are a real enthusiast.
I have included the more technical bits in a separate section at the end
of Part I, so it’s all there if you wish to indulge in the full magic of the
maths, and of course the figures reappear in the spreadsheets together with the
formulae used.
Simple
and Compound interest - the fundamentals
These Institutions created the need for some basic mathematics to enable them to maintain a fair and consistent standard for rewarding investors and charging borrowers. They had to have some simple formulae to calculate interest over time. The phrase Time is Money is an exact science as far as banks are concerned, as time is the essential ingredient of interest.
You were probably taught that there are two ways of calculating interest, simple, and the more prevalent compound interest. Simple interest is really just a simple way of calculating interest. The method used to calculate it is actually quite inaccurate but it was fashionable before computers enabled more complex but more exact calculations to be performed. The use of simple interest as a measuring tool is quite ineffective in most cases and certainly is of no value for comparing today’s sophisticated financial products.
Compound interest is the only mathematically correct method for measuring and comparing loan products. It is undoubtedly more fascinating but it demands more than a superficial understanding and it does require more thoughtful mathematical processes.
Simple
interest ignores capitalised interest
If you borrow £1,000 at 12% per annum simple
interest without paying back any capital, the interest is £120 at the end of
each and every year - twelve hundredths of the capital invested.
Simple interest ignores the fact
that interest can itself attract interest.
See Figure 1 for an easy illustration.
I have used the term principal to
identify the initial cash that starts any financial transaction. £1,000 is the principle in this example.
Whilst this is probably an old-fashioned word, it distinguishes itself
from future capital within any transaction sequence, which thereafter is simply
referred to as Capital. These
days you will more often hear the words present
value instead of principal and future
value as future capital.
|
Figure 1 Simple
interest example over three years |
|||||
| |
£1,000
growing @ 12% per annum simple, with no repayments. |
|
|||
| |
|
Interest
added |
Amount
owing |
Notes |
|
| |
Principal |
|
£1,000 |
Starting
capital |
|
| |
End
of year 1 |
£120 |
£1,120 |
12%
of £1,000 |
|
| |
End
of year 2 |
£120 |
£1,240 |
12%
of £1,000 |
|
| |
End
of year 3 |
£120 |
£1,360 |
12%
of £1,000 |
|
| |
Simple
interest is calculated on the principal only. The total interest added
over 3 years is 3 times £120 = £360. |
||||